[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] (sub)section titles rendered as fo:inline for Legal Contracts?
Craeg, > Wow! Thanks for your answer, it sounds like exactly what I am looking > for. > You're welcome; I'm glad it might be useful. > > > I was thinking of making one small tweak: it just > so happens that all of the sections that need inline > titles have no child sections-- so I could use simplesect for them. > > Using simplesect might have an advantage in that you > could apply the customizations to it alone and leave > the sectN and recursive section rules un-customized. > > What do you think? > Using simplesect may be a good way to go, since it would keep things separate. I suspect that you might get away with using Bob Stayton's example just replacing sect3 with simplesect. It's worth trying, and Bob's example is a bunch simpler (though I'm not 100% sure if it's simpler because he avoided recursive sections, or because my sample is inelegant; but either way, there's a lot less you need to copy into your customization:). BTW, if you use simplesect you do need to be sure that you only put simplesects at the level of the hierarchy you need (in the source), since you'll get a run-in heading on every simplesect, even if it appears in a different level in the hierarchy. Dick
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]