[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] Question about <formalpara>
Hi, On Friday 27 January 2006 22:54, Daniel Carrera wrote: > Thomas Schraitle wrote: > > 1. Use bold for the title, "embedded" inside the text. > > DocBook uses this style. This is a more "active" appearence. A reader > > will see it more easily and it attracts more attention. > > You mean like Don's HTML example? Yes. :-) > [...] > This could work, and it would be easy to implement. Is it fair to > assume that any <formalpara> will have only one <para> element? According to the DocBook TDG yes. A formalpara can have one para only. > If it > doesn't, would it be unreasonable to clump it all in one paragraph? Hmn, I am not sure if I understand you correct. Do you mean a para inside formalpara and some consecutive paras to clump like this? <formalpara> <title>Bla</title> <para>First line</para> </formalpara> <para>Second line</para> This could work. > From a semantic POV, I think that would be reasonable. Maybe I'll add a > newline element, but keep it all in the same semantic paragraph. Like > this: > > From: > <formalpara> > <info> <title>Foo</title> </info> > <para> Bar. </para> > <para> Biz. </para> > </formalpara> This is not valid. :) Cheers, Tom -- Thomas Schraitle
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]