[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [docbook-apps] db5: simplesect with two section ancestors
A simplesect can indeed be a child of multiple section ancestors. It merely cannot have other structural children. I am not sure exactly what structure you are attempting, but a simplesect cannot have a procedure following it, only simplesect, bibliography, glossary, index or toc elements. It could have one as a child, but you said you wanted to follow it with one (as opposed to contain one). Another alternative would be to use the task element as a container of the procedure and could be more semantically meaningful, depending on the actual intent of your document design. Larry Rowland -----Original Message----- From: Brett Leber [mailto:bleber+@cs.cmu.edu] Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 9:09 AM To: docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [docbook-apps] db5: simplesect with two section ancestors Is it valid DocBook 5 to have a simplesect element with two section ancestors (ie, section > section > simplesect)? It seems valid to me from the description on docbook.org, but XMLMind doesn't seem to allow this. (By the way, the rationale is that I'd like to have a short section with a title such as "To do x:" followed by a short procedure. 'Section' seems to overwhelm such a heading with section numbers; and as there are no nested sections within, 'simplesect' seems more semantically appropriate.) Thanks, Brett --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-apps-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-apps-help@lists.oasis-open.org
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]