[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [docbook-apps] Database for docbook components (i.e. section, para, etc) questions
I apologize for the long delay in answering. I've been having trouble with my spam filter. Yes, I use the non-chunked HTML stylesheets to make the HTML files that I convert to MS Word files. Peter Desjardins > -----Original Message----- > From: Nelson, Dean [mailto:dean.nelson@eecradar.com] > Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 15:12 > To: Peter Desjardins; docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: RE: [docbook-apps] Database for docbook components > (i.e. section, para, etc) questions > > Peter > I assume that you use the non-chunked HTML stylesheets with > CSS to make the WORD docs? > > Regards, > > Dean Nelson > Enterprise Electronics Corp > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Peter Desjardins [mailto:pdesjardins@supplyscape.com] > Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 2:00 PM > To: Nelson, Dean; docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: RE: [docbook-apps] Database for docbook components (i.e. > section, para, etc) questions > > > > Also, I would like to know if anyone uses Docbook components > > in their Word documents. We have a marketing dept. that > > insists on using the MS Word tools but the software > > developers create docs in XML/Docbook. Can the two exist so > > we only have to write one XML section and not both? > > We deliver DocBook documents in MS Word format. Some parts of the > audience need the content in MS Word so we publish DocBook > HTML > MS > Word. It's a one-way conversion. We do not take changes made in MS > Word and try to push them into the DocBook source. > > This is a relatively recent publishing requirement so we are still > solving small problems. Overall, the technique we are using > works well > and the resulting MS Word files are in good shape. > > Peter Desjardins >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]