Subject: Re: Request For Clarification: Indexterm processing in auto-index generation.
/ Tony Graham <Tony.Graham@MenteithConsulting.com> was heard to say: | On Wed, Mar 12 2008 12:18:29 +0000, email@example.com wrote: | ... |> Likewise, using pseudo-page numbers: |> |> F |> |> Foo, _1_, _2_ |> |> is misleading because readers have been conditioned to think of those as |> page numbers. A "1" under Foo should be the same place as a "1" under |> Bar which simply won't be the case. | | FWIW, I think that scheme works okay in the CSS2 index at | http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/REC-CSS2/indexlist.html Bleh. I think it looks ridiculous. But if the world disagrees with me, I won't stand in its way. I probably will give the "number all index terms sequentially" format a whirl when I have a chance. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <firstname.lastname@example.org> | When dealing with the insane, the http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | best method is to pretend to be Chair, DocBook Technical Committee | sane.--Hermann Hesse