[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] Re: [docbook] RE: [docbook-apps] RE: [docbook] RE: [docbook-apps] db 5 and Dita anyone?
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 1:53 PM, Jirka Kosek <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > There is no reason why XInclude should be slower then conref, actually I > would expect that conref will be little bit slower as it has to be > implemented during XSLT processing, not just during XML parsing. But you > have to parse included file anyway, so there should not be big difference. > If XInclude processing is slow for you then there is probably something > broken in your toolchain. I agree with Jirka in principle: XIncludes aren't necessarily slower, and even if they are, that's a tool problem rather than an XInclude problem. That said, we've experienced slowness with deep XIncludes on all of our systems (lots of architectures, OSs, tools). I do not believe their is anything broken in our toolchains. Keith