Re: [docbook-apps] Problem with XInclude

[David Carver <d_a_carver@yahoo.com>]

Do you have Xerces configured to use XInclude processing?  If not, it 
won't recognize the xincludes and will just process it normally.

I use a program called xincluder which I run before I do my 
stylesheets.   Don't know if that is an option for you or not.

Dave

Larry Garfield wrote:
> Well, that's fascinating but doesn't seem to be the root cause here.  I tried 
> changing the XInclude namespace to 2001, and the error is exactly the same.  
> It seems to just be skipping the inclusion step entirely.
>
> On Friday 08 August 2008 10:15:47 am Adam Constabaris wrote:
>   
>> For about five minutes in 2004, a "Last Call" draft of XInclude
>> indicated that the namespace  URI *was* http://www.w3.org/2003/XInclude
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/CR-xinclude-20040413/#status
>>
>> Xerces shipped a version of their parser that (only, IIRC) honoured the
>> "2003" URI, but they pulled that soon after:
>>
>> http://xerces.apache.org/xerces2-j/faq-xinclude.html#faq-10
>>
>> I wouldn't be surprised to find that some XInclude processors honour
>> either namespace, in the interest of Postel's law.
>>
>> AC
>>
>> Larry Garfield wrote:
>>     
>>> On Fri, 8 Aug 2008 10:55:55 +0200, "Mauritz Jeanson" <mj@johanneberg.com> 
>>>       
> wrote:
>   
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Larry Garfield
>>>>>
>>>>> Element include in namespace
>>>>> 'http://www.w3.org/2003/XInclude' encountered in
>>>>> part, but no template matches.
>>>>>           
>>>> The correct XInclude namespace URI is http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude.
>>>>
>>>> Mauritz
>>>>         
>>> That's fascinating because I've been using 2003 for years, and it didn't
>>> work unless I did so.  Still, I tried 2001 as well on several lines and
>>> it didn't make a difference.  Same error.
>>>
>>> (The namespace is defined on the xi:include elements directly.)
>>>
>>> --Larry Garfield
>>>       
>
>