[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] Compact DocBook ?
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 13:19:31 +0200 Remko Tronšon <email@example.com> wrote: > > then you have a perfectly normal docbook document, > > ... and you lose the ability to use of development tools like IDEs, > you have to regenerate the sources every time you make a tiny change > (which happens much more often than regenerating documentation), > debuggers get confused, you need to set up a way to name your sources > and map this to the filesystem, ... > > Unfortunately, this way of working works if the main thing you're > writing is documentation with some toy examples in them (and even > then, I personally just write scripts that embed pure source code into > DocBook includes). It doesn't work for real development. Doesn't work for you? yet you use xInclude... which could include files from your IDE? Odd, that sounds like a reasonable litprog way of doing it. Be assured, it does work for non trivial examples. regards -- regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk