[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [docbook-apps] Compact DocBook ?
>On topic though, so why not! Thanks for the help on what is appropriate etiquette. >By the looks of it, Leo is GUI ? Leo is a GUI in the sense that it displays nodes hierarchically just like Windows explorer displays folders/directories hierarchically. I am a novice at DocBook, Leo, literate programming and the like. The best thing would be to look at the Leo doco "Chapter 6: Leo and Literate Programming" at http://webpages.charter.net/edreamleo/design.html#chapter-6-leo-and-literate -programming -----Original Message----- From: Dave Pawson [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 7:38 AM To: Robert Lucente Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] Compact DocBook ? On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 06:11:46 -0400 "Robert Lucente" <email@example.com> wrote: > >Think of it the other way round? > >Embed java code in Docbook? > Nice ! > > >Tangle and weave are the ideas, > >Literate Programming the background. > > At one point, I started using Leo to do "literate programming". The > thing that I like about Leo is that it is an outliner w/ hoist and > node cloning. The downside is that it has a steep learning curve. > > http://webpages.charter.net/edreamleo/front.html > > I still use an old versio of Leo but don't do full Literate > programming. So far, the price of the learning curve is not worth it. > > I did not post this in the docbook group because it did not seem > appropriate. If I am wrong, please correct me. Some are interested in literate programming in general, so there may be some interest, but I guess it's low. On topic though, so why not! By the looks of it, Leo is GUI? I'm not sure how that helps for litprog? I use emacs, or (a java environment, then paste/include into emacs for the Docbook) regards -- regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk