Subject: Re: html 5, as a target
>>>>> Jirka Kosek writes: > Dave Pawson wrote: >> Structural markup would better match docbook semantics. > You mean those new elements which are not working in IE6 & IE7? > http://blog.whatwg.org/supporting-new-elements-in-ie >> Generally a move forward from html 4. > From markup point of view HTML5 is a mess. No grammar, no schema. HTML5 > is step forward for web applications, but in some other directions it is > step backward. We all appreciate your technical expertise, but from a marketing point of view, it's one of the biggest mistakes you or the DocBook community could make, if you said: we ignore HTML5. Would you agree? Jochen, the rough+rude Hun ;-) P.S. Me being a stubborn Darwinist, ;-) I can only emphasize, that "evolution is not always to the better". But it's sort of stupid to fight evolution, better join it, if that matters to evolution.