[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: InDesign IDML output
Hello Everyone, I've just made an attempt to export my simple document into InDesign via IDML. Intro (you can skip it) It was intended for small private project - monograph. It is mostly a plain text, several pictures, tables, but many footnotes. The source is maintained in DocBook. It can be easily exported into HTML, PDF or ePub. I've considered to create a standard book from it. I like good typography so I've tried to reuse my data in InDesign with all the features it offers. Because of the huge amount of footnotes I've choosen the way via IDML, not simle copy/paste. It was also nice XSLT challenge :-) Solution Export into InDesign was discussed several times [1, 2] and there is also Wiki page available [3]. I've based my work on XSL-FO output. For this proof-of-concept with very limited resources I reject an idea to implement everything so I've concentrated mainly on the limited vocabulary used in my document. The rest was removed. Tests Templates are capable to convert the entire document into the single story. If this XML file together with other resources is packed, it can be imported into InDesign. This works with my document, but as I said before, its structure is very simple. Caveats Quite soon I've realized that InDesign's GUI is very restrictive. You are loosing control which you have with XSLT. Yes, you have better control over page breaks, orphans, line breaks. But features not available you simply cannot fake. I am used to using the customization of XSLT a lot and I know that almost everything is possible. In InDesign my hands are bound. Several examples: forget footnotes in tables (or use nasty workaround [4]), footnoterefs, automatized linking from text to footnote and back (not so important for me now as I want just the printed output). How about restarting footnote numbering with every chapter? No. Use something like titleabbrev just for TOC? No. I am fan of InDesign from its birth, but now I am annoyed as I will have to reject its amazing typography. Footnote and TOC processing is too simple for my needs. I have to admit that footnotes isn't feature used very often in the graphical design, but for me it is really crucial (so stopper). Conclusion I have created the set of templates, which can be further improved. If you accept InDesign limitations and your documents are simple enough, you can be happy with them. They need additional polishing and explanation (on the WIKI page ?). If you are interested, please let me know. Regards, Jan ____________ [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org/msg14341.html [2] http://www.mail-archive.com/docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org/msg14348.html [3] http://wiki.docbook.org/topic/DocBookInDesign [4] http://forums.adobe.com/message/1317014
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]