[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] Docbook IEEE transformation?
Sorry. I mean that IEEE has a particular visual appearance. It doesn't look unusual, and I believe the stock XSL:FO are up to the task. I'm just very surprised to not see someone publishing a drop-in settings file that cranks out IEEE layout. Figured I should check if there's a reason. Hate to go barking down the wrong path. Dave Pawson wrote: > On Mon, 09 May 2011 10:27:07 -0700 > David Priest<docs@davidpriest.ca> wrote: > >> A bit of googling turns up a dearth of information about rendering >> IEEE-compliant technical publications. This quite surprises me. >> >> Are the XSL:FO standard transformations easily IEEE-compliant? > > For what definition of IEEE compliant David? That sounds really odd > to me, that a transform should be compliant to ... something? > > >> Looking at one of their PDFs there does not seem to be anything >> particularly special or tricksy with their layout. > > > Or do you mean the PDF needs to be 'special' in some way? > > > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]