Re: [docbook-apps] any problems with DocBook XSL 1.79.0?

[Bob Stayton <bobs@sagehill.net>]

Hi Dean,
I would suggest breaking down the process into steps and examining the 
output of each step.

So I would run xmllint --xinclude on the file to generate a document 
with XIncludes resolved, in which you can look for the id in question. 
Then generating a temporary .fo file using your stylesheet, and checking 
for the id.  And then passing that to FOP to make the PDF.  That will 
show which stage is producing the error.

Bob Stayton
Sagehill Enterprises
bobs@sagehill.net

On 10/29/2015 9:43 AM, DeanNelson@aol.com wrote:
> Bob
> Last night I ran the 1.79.0 load with my system (xsltproc, DB 4.5, fop 1.1)
> For the most part, everything works as expected. However, I am now
> getting a FOP warning when I use an XPointer. It looks like it adds it
> to the list of FOP destinations, but does not use it. Hence :
>   <xi:include xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude";
> href="../metriguard/loc-corpinfo.xml" xpointer="met-company"/>
> and
>    <corpauthor id="met-company">&CORP_TITLE;</corpauthor>
> produces this warning:
> [WARN] FOUserAgent - Destination: Unresolved ID reference "met-company"
> found.
> The FOP process produces a correct document, it just complains. Here is
> the rub and why I am concerned: it works just fine with the stock
> stylesheets, no warnings and also with the 1.78.1 sytylesheets WITH my
> customizations. So this has me a little stumped. I also noticed in the
> release notes that there was some work in this area. Somehow, the new
> stylesheet allow FOP destinations that should not be there?
> Since it works with the stock stylesheets, I am wondering how I can
> troubleshoot this in my own stylesheets and am asking for some input.
> Any clues or ideas?
> Thanks
> Dean Nelson
> In a message dated 10/21/2015 3:35:40 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
> bobs@sagehill.net writes:
>
>     It has been about a week since candidate DocBook XSL 1.79.0 was
>     released, and it has been downloaded about 150 times.  Has anyone who
>     has tried it run into any problems yet?  If so, please let me know so
>     they can be fixed for the 1.79.1 release.
>
>     --
>     Bob Stayton
>     Sagehill Enterprises
>     bobs@sagehill.net
>
>     ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>     To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-apps-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
>     For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-apps-help@lists.oasis-open.org