Re: [docbook-apps] <programlisting linenumbering="numbered"> does not number...

[Alexey Neyman <stilor@att.net>]

We have never been able to use Xerces due to this bug in XInclude:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESJ-1102

Note that it has a patch since 2005 (sic!) but hasn't been integrated yet.

Docbook stylesheets rely heavily on xml:base being correct, so if one 
has non-flat arrangement of source XMLs, all hell breaks loose.

Regards,
Alexey.


On 02/10/2017 11:21 PM, Dave Pawson wrote:
> I can understand the hassle of setting this chain up.
> Suggest you isolate each step?
>
> Validation
> Transformation to xsl-fo
> fo processing to PDF.
>
> for 2 I have
>
>
> java -Xms1024m -cp
> /myjava/saxonB.jar:/myjava/xercesImpl.jar:/myjava/xml-apis.jar:/myjava/resolver.jar:/sgml
> -Dorg.apache.xerces.xni.parser.XMLParserConfiguration=org.apache.xerces.parsers.XIncludeParserConfiguration
> net.sf.saxon.Transform -x
> org.apache.xml.resolver.tools.ResolvingXMLReader -y
> org.apache.xml.resolver.tools.ResolvingXMLReader
> -r:org.apache.xml.resolver.tools.CatalogResolver -s:$1 -xsl:$2 -o:$3
> $4
>
> 1 is the source,
> 2 the stylesheet
> 3 the output
> 4 any additional saxon params.
>
>
> Adjust parms as necessary.
>
>
> (may be out of date). My fop script is
>
> export fophome=/apps/fop10
> f=$fophome/lib
> fop=$fophome/build/fop.jar
>
> cp=$f/xmlgraphics-commons-1.4.jar:$f/batik-all-1.7.jar:$f/commons-logging-1.0.4.jar:$f/commons-io-1.3.1.jar:$f/avalon-framework-4.2.0.jar:$fop
>
> java -cp $cp org.apache.fop.cli.Main -r -c $fophome/fop.conf -fo $1 -pdf $2
>
> input fo is $1
> output pdf is $2
>
> HTH
>
>
>
>
> On 10 February 2017 at 20:26,  <stimits@comcast.net> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was going by this reference as to requirements, and have not read the
> > whole book (thus I did not yet see the Java requirement):
> > http://tdg.docbook.org/tdg/5.1/programlisting.html
> >
> > Admittedly I'm trying to do something quicker than I should and not reading
> > everything (I've been through a lot of material, but it's just a drop in the
> > bucket for everything needed when I really just need to sit down and write
> > content). I've had some frustrations getting the Java-based processors
> > working and have tried to stick to the xmllint/jing/xsltproc family for that
> > single reason. The Java-based processing answer likely also answers my
> > earlier syntax highlighting question about whether to abandon my current
> > approach with xmllint.
> >
> > To use Saxon or Xalan I would have to change the current build scheme, which
> > I've never succeeded at:
> > xmllint --output "${OBJ}/${TITLE}_monolithic.xml" --nonet --noent -xinclude
> > "${CONTENT}/${TITLE}.xml"
> > xsltproc --output ${OBJ}/${TITLE}_monolithic.fo ${XSLT}/docbook.xsl
> > ${OBJ}/${TITLE}_monolithic.xml
> > fop -c ${PREFIX}/fop.xconf -fo ${OBJ}/${TITLE}_monolithic.fo -pdf
> > ${OUT}/${TITLE}.pdf
> >
> > I realize I'm probably asking a lot, but is there any advice I can get on
> > editing that chain of commands to instead work with Saxon or Xalan? Getting
> > past the tools on the command line (for a hand written Makefile) is just
> > getting frustrating and is why the current chain of commands have never
> > evolved to anything Java-based.
> >
> > I do plan on reading more (I'm not resisting reading), but there are other
> > requirements which tend to require at least a draft to be available sooner
> > rather than later.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Bob Stayton <bobs@sagehill.net>
> > To: stimits@comcast.net, Docbook <docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org>
> > Sent: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 19:09:00 -0000 (UTC)
> > Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] <programlisting linenumbering="numbered"> does
> > not number...
> > Hi,
> > Did you read this section in my online book about line numbering? It
> > only works with Java-based processors.
> > Bob Stayton
> > Sagehill Enterprises
> > bobs@sagehill.net
> > On 2/10/2017 11:01 AM, stimits@comcast.net wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Under DocBook 5.1 I've been able to list programs, but line numbering
> > > has no effect (and there is no error under xmllint or jing). Is there
> > > some ENTITY or other precondition required for line numbering under 5.1?
> > >
> > > Thanks!