[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] Validating against Schematron
Hi Dave, Thanks for the suggestion. I hadnât used Jing in so long that I didnât remember that it has (or claims) support for Schematron. Did you modify Jing or the Schematron rules? I tried running it using the docbookxi.rng schema and also with the docbook.sch schematron rules (DocBook 5.0, .1, and 5.2) and didnât have much success. Running it using docbook.sch, I get a namespace error on db:, which is strange, since db is properly declared in the Schematron file. I even modified a test file so that it also used the prefix db: defined the same way, but no luck. Running it on docbookxi.rng (with embedded schematron rules), it doesnât flag any Schematron errors (I removed version from the root element and nested <note> inside a <note>, neither of which is not allowed by the rules). I did confirm that it flags errors against just the schema. Any ideas would be welcome. Thanks, Dick ------- XML Press XML for Technical Communicators http://xmlpress.net hamilton@xmlpress.net > On Jul 28, 2020, at 23:49, Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 at 22:55, Richard Hamilton <hamilton@xmlpress.net> wrote: >> >> This is a question for the group. >> >> What do you currently use for validating DocBook agains both RelaxNG and Schematron? >> >> Iâve been looking around and downloading and trying some 10-to-15 year old solutions, but I figure there has to be something newer (or an update to one of the older ones) that does the job. > > Jing? Fast and accurate. Does the job well IMHO. > > > regards > > > -- > Dave Pawson > XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. > Docbook FAQ.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]