[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] Do different xslt processors and parsers really make a difference for pdf output?
Pure prejudice Kevin. Saxon. 6.x if you need xslt 1.0, otherwise 10 if you can. No connection (other than experience) with Saxon. HTH On Tue, 6 Jul 2021 at 18:29, Kevin Dunn <kdunn@hsc.edu> wrote: > > Thanks, Norm. Yes, I evaluated fop, xep, and ahf, and bought the Antenna House Formatter. My question now is between xsltproc, Saxon 6.5, and Saxon 10. All three are working for me, and I don't have a reason to prefer one to the others. Is there one? > > Get Outlook for Android > > ________________________________ > From: Norm Tovey-Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> > Sent: Tuesday, July 6, 2021, 12:46 PM > To: Kevin Dunn > Cc: docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] Do different xslt processors and parsers really make a difference for pdf output? > > Kevin Dunn <kdunn@hsc.edu> writes: > > Are there reasons to prefer one of these xslt processors to the > > others? Is it worth looking at the commercial processors? > > Thatâs going to depend on how complicated your output is. The commercial > processors like AntennaHouse offer both better and more complete support > for the FO specification. They also offer extensions for things that > never got standardized. > > Be seeing you, > norm > > -- > Norman Tovey-Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> > https://nwalsh.com/ > > > Man is not logical and his intellectual history is a record of mental > > reserves and compromises. He hangs on to what he can in his old beliefs > > even when he is compelled to surrender their logical basis.--John Dewey > -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]