Re. author
appearing between the title and
the first stanza: as author is not part of the poem, should it be here?
How
about as an attribute of the poem element (I’m sure someone has already
suggested this)?
Also, some
sources define stanza more
tightly than others: the UK
resource http://revisioncentre.co.uk/gcse/english/poetic_terminology.html
defines a stanza as “Four or more rhymed
lines
repeated as a unit”. Other (US) sources refer to “a
unit of lines in a poem which usually share a metrical or thematic
pattern”
(wps.ablongman.com/wps/media/objects/130/133428/glossary.html”).
I don’t know whether the term stanza is therefore suitable for blank
verse/epic poetry such as Milton’s Paradise Lost, which is divided into
Books which are divided (irregularly) into groups of lines of varying
size.
There is also the common
term “verse” in
poetry, which seems to be commonly defined as “a unit of poetry such as
a
line or stanza”.
I therefore like the TEI
approach, as it seems flexible
enough to account for local variations in terminology. The below is
just a
quick outline of the structure of Paradise Lost, not an attempt at a
generic
model:
<poem>
<title>Paradise
Lost</title>
<book number =”6”>
<title>Book
VI</title>
<summary>Raphael
continues to relate…</summary>
<lg group=”verse”>
<line>All
night the dreadless
Angel unpursu'd</line>
<line>Through
Heav'ns wide
Champain held his way, till Morn,</line>
…
</lg>
<lg>
<line>Servant
of God, well done,
well hast thou fought</line>
…
</lg>
</book>
</poem>
Note that in the above
example, the “argument”
appears in the first edition, but not in all subsequent editions.
A final thought – do we
need any markup for
contentious readings/variant text? There are many scholarly debates in
this
area.
Interestingly enough, TEI uses
a generic <lg>
(line group) container with a type attribute to classify the groups for
things
like: stanza, sestet, couplet, quatrain, etc. Perhaps stanza in my
example
should be more generic as well?
I'm afraid para might be too big or create formatting issues? Will a
linegroup
or individual lines will be used enough to justify new elements, or
not? Are
there semantically important distinctions that should be made for lines
of
text?
--Scott
Keith Fahlgren wrote:
On 1/21/08 8:52 AM, Scott Hudson wrote:
Regarding agenda item 8, I found an interesting example at:
http://celtic.benderweb.net/webit/docs/basics/node_4.html
This may be simple enough to meet our needs? What other markup may be
needed? I think the simple content model could be defined by:
db.poem =
element poem
{
db.poem.attlist,
db.poem.info,
db.stanza*
}
db.stanza =
element stanza
{
db.stanza.attlist,
db.line*
}
line != para?
element stanza
{
db.stanza.attlist,
db.para*,
db.formalpara*
}
<poem>
<info>
<title>Bitter for Sweet</title>
<author>
<firstname>Christina</firstname>
<surname>Rossetti</surname>
</info>
<stanza>
<para>Summer is gone with all its roses,</para>
<para>Its sun and perfumes and sweet flowers,</para>
<para>Its warm air and refreshing showers</para>
<para>And even Autumn closes.</para>
</stanza>
<stanza>
<para>Yea, Autumn's chilly self is going,</para>
<para>And winter comes which is yet colder;</para>
<para>Each day the hoar-frost waxes bolder</para>
<para>And the last buds cease blowing.</para>
</stanza>
</poem>
?
<poem>
<info>
<title>Bitter for Sweet</title>
<author>
<firstname>Christina</firstname>
<surname>Rossetti</surname>
</info>
<stanza>
<para>Summer is gone with all its roses,</para>
<para>Its sun and perfumes and sweet flowers,</para>
<para>Its warm air and refreshing showers</para>
<para>And even Autumn closes.</para>
</stanza>
<stanza>
<para>Yea, Autumn's chilly self is going,</para>
<para>And winter comes which is yet colder;</para>
<para>Each day the hoar-frost waxes bolder</para>
<para>And the last buds cease blowing.</para>
</stanza>
</poem>
Keith