[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Meeting Minutes -- Feb 6, 2008
DocBook Publishers Sub-Committee Meeting Minutes -- February 6, 2008 Agenda: 1. Roll call Attendees: Jim Earley Keith Fahlgren Richard Hamilton John Hanratty Scott Hudson (chair) John Pedersen Norm Walsh 2. Accepting the minutes[1] of the previous meeting. Accepted 3. Next meeting: 1st Wed of every month 4. Review of the agenda. Add DocBook 5.0 update from Norm 5. Review of open action items a. Norm to delete docbook-publishers@sourceforge.net list Continue b. Norm to help set up the RFE tracker on sourceforge to track our enhancements. Continue: Keith will take over this Action Item c. Scott to also ping folks at Mulberry, since they worked quite a bit on the NLM (Journal) schemas. Continue d. All: look for good examples of dialog and poetry Continue e. Scott: put query out on list for ideas on handling dialog; especially identifying speakers. Continue f. Scott: Send email to sourceforge list and ask people to subscribe to the OASIS list. Done g. Gary: Look for additional examples of legal citations. Done h. All: Try out publishers.rnc[1]: Continue 6. Proposed Roadmap a. Identify elements that should be part of Core DocBook b. Identify potential "modules" for elements currently part of DocBook but belonging to a particular domain. c. Recommend Core DocBook and proposed modules to DocBook TC d. Identify general publishing needs not currently met by DocBook e. Identify additional specific domains within publishing industry that may need specific modules. f. develop RFEs from identified needs Group has completed a-f. g. develop DocBook v5.0 schema enhancements from RFEs Scott: request for further domains of interest. once RFE tracker is in place, he will ask community. h. submit schema enhancements for approval to DocBook TC 7. Discuss legal citation content models (submitted by Gary Hoffman) Scott sent out email from Gary (per Action Item) Gary found 6 standard formats. Scott asked: do we want a single model or separate types with separate content models? Keith: would like one; group agrees. Discussion concerning how to manage the many different ways of making legal citations. At least two major dimensions: - Types of citations (e.g., cases, books and treatises, articles, constitutions, and statutes) - Source of citations (both national differences and intra-national differences; e.g., U.S. State vs. U.S. Federal law) Some discussion about whether to use a mechanism like class attributes to define different types of citations within a single model, or to have different models. Consensus is to have a single, open-ended model, understanding that it will need to be extended for some applications and locations. What to call base citation element? Modify citation element or make new element? Straw poll of team, which unanimously agrees that new element with a name like "legalcitation" would be best, rather than overloading citation. Norm: suggests we put out something as soon as we have something reasonable. 8. Norm Walsh status on DocBook v5.0 Public review will begin shortly. Will be a 60 day review. If no comments come in that require change, then standard could be acted on by group as early as May, but might take until June or July. Norm suggests the publishing group not wait for the 5.0 process to complete before distributing proposals. x. Review of Requests for Enhancement NEW ACTIONS: Scott: Will send link to sourceforge modules John: Will look up citation conventions in UK. He will look for possible overlaps. All: look for more examples of citations All: Submit additional agenda items for next meeting. Norm: Add Scott and Keith as administrators in sourceforge - Done (fast work, Norm:)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]