Re: [docbook-publishers] Another resource for neutral citations - UK, EU practice

["Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com>]

On 18/02/2008, Hanratty, John (LNG-LON) <john.hanratty@lexisnexis.co.uk> wrote:
>
>
> https://ilrb.cardiff.ac.uk/citingreferences/oscola/tutorial/index.html
>
> Legislation  (UK):

From which:
<casename> | <legislation> | <parties>
<country>
<year>
<reference role=''>?   - optional
<section role='section' value='19'/>
<section role='subsection' value='1'/>
<section role='paragraph' value='b'/>

>
>
> Legislation  (EU):

> Example:
> Council Directive (EC) 2001/29 on the harmonisation of certain  aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society [2001] OJ  L167/10



On 18/02/2008, Hanratty, John (LNG-LON) <john.hanratty@lexisnexis.co.uk> wrote:
>
>
> https://ilrb.cardiff.ac.uk/citingreferences/oscola/tutorial/index.html
>
> Legislation  (UK):

From which:
<casename> | <legislation> | <parties> R v G
<country>UK
<year>2003
<reference role='referrence'>UKHL50


Sort of fits?

Should legislation fall into same 'box' as individual court cases? Seems odd.

Prime name seems variant
country required
year required
reference optional
As many (optional) nested sections as are needed,
each taking a role attribute to use locale specific identities.



regards


-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk