[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: DocBook V4.0beta1
/ Michael Sabrio <rms@fpk.hp.com> was heard to say: | better. I'm just trying to nudge 4.0 to be a little less painful for our | legacy. Fair enough. And not about to suggest that we make some significant fraction of HP Unix documentation invalid :-) | > | Is there any way we could remove Command and Literal from the list of | > | elements to be restricted to %smallcptr.char.mix in 4.0? | > | > That's one option, and it might be the best thing, but is there | > anything you really want other than Option and Optional? I mean, | > would (%smallcptr.char.mix;|option|optional)* work for you? (I | > have reservations about option and optional in literal, but | > since you've got significant legacy, I won't argue the point :-) | | I looked through the inlines, especially tech.char.class, and as | my examples suggest, the ones that seemed most natural in Commands | (and Literals) are Option|Optional|Filename|EnVar; but that seems | a little arbitrary. Yep. We should just leave it the way it is, I think. I'll put the RFE back in for Command and Literal and we can revisit at the next meeting. | Thanks and Happy Holidays. Same to you! And everyone else on the list! :-) Cheers, norm -- Norman Walsh <nwalsh@arbortext.com> | Men do not quit playing because Principal Software Engineer | they grow old; they grow old Arbortext, Inc. (www.arbortext.com) | because they quit 413.256.6985 Voice/FAX | playing.--Oliver Wendell Holmes
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC