Re: DocBook V4.0beta4

[Norman Walsh <nwalsh@arbortext.com>]

/ Michael Sabrio <rms@fpk.hp.com> was heard to say:
| I thought they were valid at some point.  (DocBook: TDG says they
| are OK.)  But I see that they were excluded in 3.0 and 2.4 as well.

Ugh! There's a nasty presentation problem in the book. (I don't
have the print book in hand, so I'm not sure if it's bad or very
bad.)

If you look in the online book, you'll see after the list of
children the list of excluded elements. That needs to be made
more explicit.  (I have this fear that that section doesn't
appear at all in the print book. Double-ugh!)

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <nwalsh@arbortext.com> | I have often wondered why I
Principal Software Engineer         | [keep] going...There [can] be no
Arbortext, Inc. (www.arbortext.com) | hope and no reward. I always
413.256.6985 Voice/FAX              | recognized that bitter truth. But
                                    | I am a man, and a man is
                                    | responsible for himself.--Sam
                                    | Magruder (George Gaylord Simpson)