Re: Change processing expectations of ulink?

[Eduardo Gutentag <eduardo.gutentag@eng.sun.com>]

Norman Walsh wrote:
> 
> / Eduardo Gutentag <eduardo.gutentag@eng.sun.com> was heard to say:
> | Actually, I interpreted it as meaning "EMPTY", as in <!ELEMENT foo
> | EMPTY>, with the two last cases at the discretion of the stylesheet
> | writer... ;-)
> 
> Ack! We can't make ulink EMPTY,
> <ulink url="mailto:eduardo@eng.sun.com">Eduardo</ulink>.

I wasn't proposing making it EMPTY, I was just saying that if it
could be interpreted as having been declared as such, then
use the url; sorry for the (mental) shorthand.

> 
> Actually, that's probably going to come across as evidence *for*
> rather than *against* making it empty, isn't it :-)

Why thanks! ;-)

> 
>                                         Be seeing you,
>                                           norm
> 
> --
> Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>      | It'll cost you.
> http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ |
> Chair, DocBook Technical Committee |

-- 
Eduardo Gutentag               |         e-mail: eduardo@eng.Sun.COM
XML Technology Center          |         Phone:  (650) 786-5498
Sun Microsystems Inc.          |         fax:    (650) 786-5727