Re: [docbook-tc] Email ballot: 440667 Affiliation lacks CorpName

[Michael Smith <smith@xml-doc.org>]

Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> writes:

> Proposed: Resolve RFE 440667 (Affiliation lacks CorpName) per the
> published proposal[1]. Please respond YEA or NAY to
> docbook-tc@lists.oasis-open.org before Tuesday, 26 Feb 2002 at 05:00p
> EST (02:00p PST, 22:00GMT, 23:00BST, 00:00CEST+, 07:00JST+).
> 
>                                         Be seeing you,
>                                           norm
> 
> [1] http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=9351&group_id=21935

I vote YEA for removing corpname.

But I have a some questions about the additional attributes:

    classname   (corporation|nonprofit|informal|other)  #IMPLIED
    otherclass  CDATA                #IMPLIED

1. Why "classname" and not just "class"?

2. What's "otherclass" for?

3. Would it be worthwhile to add "consortium" to the enumerated list
   of values for classname? (for marking up consortium names like
   OASIS and W3C/World Wide Web Consortium)


  --Mike