[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Gary to investigate ISO 9000 regarding guidelines for accepting or rejecting requests...
Hi guys, This is a bit undercooked as I am in the process of moving countries and have so much to do, gosh! However, hopefully I made a worthwhile start... I found out the ISO 9000 compliances would just mean documenting the steps properly (I would suggest as series of forms to automate this) and writing a quality procedure document (to properly document and explain the processes). The rest of this mail is a start at suggested some useful structure elements for: 1. The Forms 2. The Quality procedure document ...it needs quite a bit more work done but I am interested firstly to see what people think before I spend more time reworking some of the architecture: PART1: CHANGE/FEATURE THREE PHASE FORM SUBMISSION + Submission Phase + Change/Feature Proposal Form + Control Information - Raised date: (system generated) - Change Proposal number: : (system generated) + Identification - Requested by: (mandatory from originator) - Company: (optional from originator) - Department: (optional from originator) - Email: (mandatory from originator) - Address: (optional from originator) - Telephone: (mandatory from originator) + Summary of changes: - Title: (mandatory from originator) - Purpose: (optional from originator) - Description of problem issues: (mandatory from originator) - Justification of change: (optional from originator) - Current workaround: (optional from originator) - Change Type: (code | documentation) + Assessment Phase + Change management Control - Request for change (RFC) initial notification date: - Embargoed by: + level of industry support - priority: + likely impact - Configuration items potentially affected by change: - Impact on documentation: - related changes: + solicit views - Synopsis of change - Implementation notification required: - Proposed Release date/or implementation date: + Approval Phase + reject - unreasonable implementation time: - unreasonable cost: - no industry support: - other reasons: + defer - unreasonable implementation time: - unreasonable cost: - no industry support: - other reasons: + approve - Allocated to: - Allocated by: - Date proposed for system Testing: - Date proposed for Live running: - Action by: - Functionality checked by: - Code/Standards checked by: - Other systems impact checked by: - Comments + evaluated + fixed + tested PART2: CHANGE/FEATURE REQUEST PROCEDURE DOCUMENT + Introduction - Definition: Formal Change/Feature Proposal for docbook + Objectives to formally document - Desired change to the docbook. - Rationale for the change. - Requestor of the change. + Benefits - Clarification of request - Requestors contact details + Contents - Requestor, Request Date, Change Request Identifier, Priority etc. Rationale, Impact, Status, etc. + Responsibilities - Evaluator: (Members of TC) - Implementer: (Members of TC) - Tester: (Members of TC) + Process Steps - Feature/Change request received from web Form - Send Confirmation of received request - Raise Feature/Change request for assessment at telecom - Agree, reject or defer democratically in TC - Post implementation checks - Amend Request Status + Change/Feature request overview diagram: - (add process diagram here) + Preconditions - Change request form must have been filled in correctly - The change control meeting achieves quorum - etc... + Guidelines - Automated Forms and database - templates - standards + Conventions - Work Flow - Content and Format Standard - Template - Inspection Kind Regards, Gary Cornelius -- +----------------+-------------------+ | Gary Cornelius | gary@cornelius.bz | +----------------+-------------------+ | 15 Queensberry Street, Apt. #21 | | Boston, MA, 02215, USA | | Telephone: 617 670 3907 | +------------------------------------+
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]