RE: [docbook-tc] Public identifier for Publishers SC variants?

["Dick Hamilton" <rlhamilton@frii.com>]

The only comment I have is more on the description in ch05 on
how to name variants, subsets, and extensions.  Seems like
using "-Based" is redundant.

Why not simply say "...DocBook V5.0 Variant for ...," or
"...DocBook V5.0-Subset for ...," with or without a hyphen
between the version and the rest of the line?  Seems like
that would convey the same information and tighten up the
identifier.

Not a big deal, it just seems redundant.

Dick


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Hudson [mailto:scott.hudson@flatironssolutions.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 3:41 PM
> To: DocBook Technical Committee
> Subject: [docbook-tc] Public identifier for Publishers SC variants?
> 
> 
> Based on the description in ch05 
> (http://www.docbook.org/tdg/en/html/ch05.html), our variant PI would 
> look something like:
> -//OASIS//DTD DocBook V5.0-Based Variant For Publishers V1.0//EN
> 
> Any suggestions/changes? There may be other variants produced 
> by the SC, 
> and could perhaps be handled as:
> -//OASIS//DTD DocBook V5.0-Based Variant For Legal Publishers V1.0//EN
> -//OASIS//DTD DocBook V5.0-Based Variant For Education 
> Publishers V1.0//EN
> -//OASIS//DTD DocBook V5.0-Based Variant For Medical 
> Publishers V1.0//EN
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> -- Scott
>