Re: [docbook-tc] Public identifier for Publishers SC variants?

["Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com>]

On 24/05/07, Steven Cogorno <Steven.Cogorno@sun.com> wrote:
>
> On May 23, 2007, at 2:41 PM, Scott Hudson wrote:
>
> > Based on the description in ch05 (http://www.docbook.org/tdg/en/
> > html/ch05.html), our variant PI would look something like:
> > -//OASIS//DTD DocBook V5.0-Based Variant For Publishers V1.0//EN
> >


I've got a problem with this - one for the main TC too.

We aren't developing a DTD, shouldn't be using a PI declaration etc.

Norm? What might the Relax NG version say about this?

regards


-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk