Re: [docbook-tc] Review of The Definitive Guide for 5.0

[Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>]

Hi Mary,

Did you get this message that I sent last week?

/ Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> was heard to say:
| / "Mary McRae" <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org> was heard to say:
| | Hi Norm,
| |
| |   Here's the process:
| |
| | 1. I need to set up two special majority ballots for the TC to:
| | a) approve 5.0 as a Committee Specification, and
|
| Please setup that ballot.
|
| | For a) to happen, I need the an updated copy of 5.0 to point to in the ballot.
| | That means the prose component, including conformance statements (in original
| | source, XHTML, and PDF), as well as the actual DTD/schema/grammar files.
|
| That's the Public Review Draft, per the process, right?
|
| | For b) to happen, I need at least three statements of use from organizational
| | members
| |
| | The two ballots can run simultaneously; if you do not yet have the statements of
| | use I can start a) and then start b) when you're ready.
|
| Let's get a) started right away. It's going to pass, and b) will
| follow on almost immediately, but I don't have three statements from
| organizational members at hand today.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>      | Everything should be made as
http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | simple as possible, but no simpler.
Chair, DocBook Technical Committee |

PGP signature