RE: [docbook-tc] Charter Revision

["Dick Hamilton" <rlhamilton@frii.com>]

Interesting, I missed those references. I just looked at the
way the DITA team referred to subcommittees, is sans-camel.

I'm willing to go along with whatever the TC prefers.

Dick

Managing Writers: A Real World Guide to Managing Technical Documentation
http://xmlpress.net/managingwriters.html 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Hudson [mailto:scott.hudson@flatironssolutions.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 10:50 AM
> To: Norman Walsh
> Cc: docbook-tc@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Re: [docbook-tc] Charter Revision
> 
> 
> The OASIS site has SC and SubCommittee in several places. Seems like 
> that is the convention.
> 
> --Scott
> 
> Scott Hudson
> Senior XML Architect
> 
> e: scott.hudson@FlatironsSolutions.com
> O: 303.542.2146
> C: 303.332.1883
> F: 303.544.0522
> 
http://www.FlatironsSolutions.com
Vision. Experience. Engineering Excellence.



Norman Walsh wrote:
> "Gershon Joseph (gerjosep)" <gerjosep@cisco.com> writes:
>
>   
>> I'm not sure about limited the sentence to "supports". Maybe the
>> following is better:
>> The TC's deliverables currently include the XML DocBook schema, a
>> simplified authoring subset, and a variant for the publishing
industry.
>>     
>
> That sounds good.
>
> Editorially, does OASIS refer to subcommittees as "SubCommittee"s?
> Camel case looks a little odd there to my eyes.
>
>                                         Be seeing you,
>                                           norm
>
>   

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php