[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook-tc] RE: DocBook Technical Committee Meeting Agenda: 17 June 2009
Scott Hudson <scott.hudson@flatironssolutions.com> writes: > We don't want to "copy" DITA, but to enable capabilities beyond what > DITA can provide. This is where the relationships is more powerful, > IMO, than the reltable approach in DITA. I think we should be aiming for a balance here. There are a number of conflicting goals, I think: 1. We want the result to look and feel like DocBook 2. To the extent that users with DITA map experience know where the pain is in those maps, we should try to do a better job 3. We don't want to be gratuitously different from DITA maps since there will undoubtably be some users with DITA maps experience. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | I don't make predictions. I never http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | have and I never will.--Tony Blair Chair, DocBook Technical Committee |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]