[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook-tc] proposal: add relatedlink element to topic
"Rowland, Larry" <larry.rowland@hp.com> writes: >>I'm not entirely comfortable with a model that says these elements >>might or might not resolve and that that might or might not be a >>problem. > > This is an unfortunate problem of any reference in content that is > intended for assembly into arbitrary collections. Unless the person > defining the assembly knows all the references made among the bits > and pieces being assembled, there will most likely be references > that do not resolve unless references that cross topic boundaries > are forbidden. That would, of course, make content much less useful > to the consumer of the content. Indeed. Perhaps I just have to learn to live with my discomfort. >>How are relatedlinks in a document related to (no pun intended) the >>relatedlinks section in an assembly file? > > My understanding is that the relatedlinks in a topic would > be merged with the relatedlinks specified in an assembly and > duplicates would be coalesced. Ok. So the relationships look like this: <relationship type="collection"> <!-- This is a collection that might be presented as list of links or references to pages. Applies across any documents that include the modules. --> <association>Advanced User Topics</association> <instance linkend="xidi.parameters.syntax"/> <instance linkend="svn.properties"/> </relationship> What do the inline relatelink elements look like? Do they have content, or are they empty? How is the link target indicated? How would a processing system know which relationships from which collections to combine with the inline links? > Once the list is generated, they > would be sorted and collated and presented at the end of the > topic. I felt it would be desirable to have the ability to > indicate where the related links belong, since a section with > multiple topics in it would probably not be best with the > relatedlinks for each topic to follow the topic, but people more > familiar with DITA felt that a rule based model would be adequate. What are the rules and where are they expressed? Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | More men become good through http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | practice than through Chair, DocBook Technical Committee | nature.--Democritus of Abdera
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]