[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook-tc] Fw: informaltable inside table
"Bob Stayton" <bobs@sagehill.net> writes: > This message raised an issue that I'm not understanding. It appears > that the Cals table <entry> element in DocBook 5 does indeed permit > <table>, but not <informaltable>. I don't remember allowing <table> > inside <entry>, so I'm wondering if this is a bug? It's a bug. And informaltable is allowed too. Drat. Bob, will you make an RFE for this? I'm going to propose that we fix this in 5.1 even if it's not backwards compatible because it's a clear bug. Can you also add "revise backwards compatible change" rules on the agenda? I think we need a clause that says we may fix obvious bugs. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | He would like to start from http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | scratch. Where is scratch?--Elias Chair, DocBook Technical Committee | Canetti
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]