[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook-tc] Re: RFE 3107140
On 20 June 2011 17:00, Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz> wrote: > On 20.6.2011 11:21, Dave Pawson wrote: > >> I disagree with alt as internal markup on semantic grounds >> http://www.docbook.org/tdg/en/html/alt.html > > I suggest to read DocBook V5 definition of alt which was changed since V4.x: > > http://www.docbook.org/tdg5/en/html/alt.html > > Does V5 alt works for you? Description A text (or other nonvisual) description of a graphical element. This is intended to be an alternative to the graphical presentation. No, with that definition? Almost contradicts (or expands on) alt — A text-only annotation, often used for accessibility If the description were made more general (perhaps with an accessibility slant) then yes. Would this cause confusion with 4.x users if changed to a more general use from a graphics only? regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]