[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook-tc] Abbrevs
On 12 August 2011 15:21, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: > Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com> writes: >> On 11 August 2011 14:47, Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz> wrote: >>> On 3.8.2011 15:22, Norman Walsh wrote: >>>> I noticed this in a slide by Syd Bauman >>>> >>>> <choice> >>>> <abbrev>LASER</abbrev> >>>> <expand>Light Amplification ...</expand> >>>> </choice> >> >> Nice and simple, but I don't like the 'choice' wrapper? >> Not very semantic? > > Yeah, I'm not really suggesting we adopt it, just observing that TEI > (apparently) took a very direct approach to the problem. and I'm not sure > 'choice' is un-semantic really. > > Be seeing you, > norm As in choose either the abbreviation or the full word? Yes... once explained :-) It's clean, simple. <abbrev> <abbrev>LASER</abbrev> <expand>Light Amplification ...</expand> </abbrev> Mmm. Perhaps choice is better. Any improvement on choice? regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]