[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [docbook-tc] relatedlink element?
I agree. It is desirable but does not provide functionality that cannot be achieved through other mechanisms already in place. LRR -----Original Message----- From: docbook-tc@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:docbook-tc@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of Norman Walsh Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 9:52 AM To: docbook-tc@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [docbook-tc] relatedlink element? "Rowland, Larry" <larry.rowland@hp.com> writes: > It is a good idea, but I don't think we every fleshed it out. I would > definitely not hold things up for it, although it would be a nice > feature to have and would be much less burdensome than using > conditional text for the same thing. Sounds like a good feature request for 5.2 :-) Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | The First Amendment is often http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | inconvenient. But that is besides Chair, DocBook Technical Committee | the point. Inconvenience does not | absolve the government of its | obligation to tolerate | speech.--Justice Anthony Kennedy, | in 91-155
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]