RE: [docbook-tc] relatedlink element?

["Rowland, Larry" <larry.rowland@hp.com>]

I agree.  It is desirable but does not provide functionality that cannot be achieved through other mechanisms already in place.

LRR

-----Original Message-----
From: docbook-tc@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:docbook-tc@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of Norman Walsh
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 9:52 AM
To: docbook-tc@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [docbook-tc] relatedlink element?

"Rowland, Larry" <larry.rowland@hp.com> writes:
> It is a good idea, but I don't think we every fleshed it out. I would
> definitely not hold things up for it, although it would be a nice
> feature to have and would be much less burdensome than using
> conditional text for the same thing.

Sounds like a good feature request for 5.2 :-)

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>      | The First Amendment is often
http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | inconvenient. But that is besides
Chair, DocBook Technical Committee | the point. Inconvenience does not
                                   | absolve the government of its
                                   | obligation to tolerate
                                   | speech.--Justice Anthony Kennedy,
                                   | in 91-155