[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: Fwd: Recursive use of elements <option> and <optional>
Bob Stayton <bobs@sagehill.net> writes: > Jürgen points out that DocBook 5 restricts the content of <option> and > <optional> much more than DocBook 4. Indeed, DocBook 4's content > models included the entire %tech.char.class; which had all the > technical elements, while DocBook 5.0 and 5.1 have only a short list > of general inline text elements. I don't see anything in the > Transition Guide about this change. Does anyone recall why we did > this, and if there is an alternative way of expressing complex syntax > examples? No. It seems quite possible that this was an unintended consequence of tightening up the models generally. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | To think is not enough; you must think http://nwalsh.com/ | of something.--Jules Renard
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]