[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: DocBook repository confusion
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> writes: > On another front, the publishers 1.1 schema appears to have been > checked into the 5.1 branch, but not master. So the version in the 5.2 > branch is 1.0 not 1.1. Iâm in the process of bringing the publishers > version in the 5.2-dev branch up to 1.1+. Sorry. I was confused. Apparently it *was* in master, but not in 5.1. > I propose also that we publish a 1.2b of Publishers thatâs based off > of 5.2 DocBook schema. Mostly this involves marking new elements as > ânot allowedâ (buildtarget, legalsection, etc.) Apparently admonitions were forbidden from publishers 1.0 but allowed in 1.1, so Iâm leaveing danger in 1.2. > Does the TC have a sense of whether or not âformalgroupâ should be in > Publishers? Iâm leaving this in as well, for the moment. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Hanging is too good for a man who makes http://nwalsh.com/ | puns; he should be drawn and | quoted.--Fred Allen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]