[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: DOCBOOK: Re: DocBook 4.0 - SGML or XML?
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> writes: > XML V1.0 is SGML. I don't think it's a foregone conclusion that XML > V1.0+delta will also be SGML. I'd would be hard (and stupid) to break SGML conformance at the document level. > In fact, schema languages other than DTD syntax already break SGML > compatibility at some level, at least conceptually. AFAIK, "Schemata" will add additional contraints -- people who really need contraints might be better served with an SQL system (IMO) or check them on the application level. "schema languages" sic -- no standard thus far, more than one offering. -- work : ke@suse.de | : http://www.suse.de/~ke/ | ------ ,__o home : ke@gnu.franken.de | ------ _-\_<, : http://www.franken.de/users/gnu/ke/ | ------ (*)/'(*)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC