[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: DOCBOOK: Re: new problems with xt and passivetex...
[ We should move this over to docbook-apps ] / "Sebastian Rahtz" <sebastian.rahtz@computing-services.oxford.ac.uk> was heard to say: | Arrigo Benedetti writes: | > I'm trying to typeset the following XML document (test.xml), compliant | > with the Simplified DocBook XML V4.0.1, by using the latest DocBook XSL | > stylesheets: | | The Docbook XSL stylesheets us an old version of the XSL FO spec; | PassiveTeX implements (partially) the current draft, so don't expect | it to work in this situation. I consider this a priority item, and I am working on it, but if anyone finds specific places where I'm generating the wrong thing, please feel free to let me know :-) Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | It would not be better if things http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | happened to men just as they Chair, DocBook Technical Committee | wished.--Heraclitus
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC