[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: DOCBOOK: Re: DocBook 4.0 - SGML or XML?
Wrote Karl Eichwalder on Wed, May 31, 2000 at 08:27:43AM +0200: > Bob Stayton <bobs@sco.COM> writes: > > > I'll be provocative and say that XML has a future > > and SGML doesn't. > > Sorry, but XML is SGML. If you feel the need, do your authoring in SGML > and convert to XML for processing the documents (or vice versa). True - the SGML/XML argument doesn't make sense because SGML isn't comparable to XML. But for DocBook it makes a difference as there is DocBook SGML and DocBook XML. And at the moment considering the huge amount of XML tool development going on (IBM, Apache, Sun, Gnome etc etc) compared to the depressingly small amount of SGML tool development going on (umm who?), it would seem that doing things in XML makes more sense. What are the drawbacks in moving to using the DocBook XML DTD as soon as possible? Would seem to me that lots of fun is ready to be had with things like Cocoon. And there might possibly be a powerful free XML editor available within the millenium as opposed to the dazzling array of dazzling-ly priced commercial SGML editing options at the moment (umm - ArborText, XMetal, FrameMaker). Chuck
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC