OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

docbook message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Subject: RE: DOCBOOK: Code markup.


Juan R. Migoya
     Sent: 25 June 2000 12:12

     Check te <refentry> element. Perhaps you find more options
     there to play
     with.

Again, its a 'maybe', described as
<quote>RefEntry -- A reference page (originally a UNIX man-style reference
page)</quote>
Which presumably means its a 'how to use' instance.

The tdg examples appear way out (tdg\html\refentry.html)
(no formatted output Norm?)

My need is to talk about an instance use of a function, its params
its return values etc.

How about
<para> <cmdsynopsis sepchar=" ">
  <command moreinfo="none">xf86GetFlipPixels()</command>
  <arg choice="opt" rep="norepeat">-flippixels</arg>
  <!-- one of (sbr group arg command) -->
 </cmdsynopsis>
 <para>Returns <computeroutput>TRUE</computeroutput> if -flippixels is
present on the command line, and <computeroutput>FALSE</computeroutput>
otherwise</para></para>

Which, as you said ;-), I found via that command.

Regards, DaveP

     Dave Pawson wrote:

     > In one of the documents I'm doing, I have 'descriptions'
     > of whats happening.
     > E.g.
     >  <p><tt>Bool xf86GetFlipPixels()</tt></p>
     >        <p>Returns <tt>TRUE</tt> if <tt>-flippixels</tt> is
     >       present on the command line, and <tt>FALSE</tt> otherwise.</p>
     >    <p><tt>const char *xf86GetServerName()</tt></p>
     >        <p>Returns the name of the X server from the command line.</p>
     >
     > This is marked up ~according to the linuxdoc DTD :-)
     >
     > I've no intention of working on it in this DTD,
     > but when I get it across to docbook (x)
     > I'd like to know how it should be marked up.
     >
     > funcdef ok for the function names,
     > funcparams for -flippixels is my initial guess, I'd like it
     > confirming please.
     > I have the distinct feeling that they are related to function
     > definitions rather than descriptions since they are part of
     funcsynopsis
     > , or am I being too pedantic?
     >
     > Any assistance appreciated.


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Powered by eList eXpress LLC