[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: DOCBOOK: No <co> in <userinput> ?
On Sun, Jul 02, 2000 at 05:24:51PM -0400, Norman Walsh wrote: > / Nik Clayton <email@example.com> was heard to say: > | Is there any reason why <co> (callout) is allowed in <screen> but > | disallowed in <userinput>? I'd have thought being able to mark parts > | of a user's command line to refer back to in discussion would be a useful > | facility. > > I don't think we ever considred someone wanting to put CO inside an > inline. It doesn't seem unreasonable to me. File an RFE and we'll > discuss it at the next meeting. Done. Incidentally, do you think it would be worthwhile having new RFEs automatically posted here for further discussion? N -- Internet connection, $19.95 a month. Computer, $799.95. Modem, $149.95. Telephone line, $24.95 a month. Software, free. USENET transmission, hundreds if not thousands of dollars. Thinking before posting, priceless. Somethings in life you can't buy. For everything else, there's MasterCard. -- Graham Reed, in the Scary Devil Monastery
Powered by eList eXpress LLC