RE: DOCBOOK: Would you buy the DocBook book?

[Dave Pawson <daveP@dpawson.freeserve.co.uk>]

At 10:49 29/10/2001 +1000, Phillip Shelton wrote:
>It is in need of heavy review and editing.  I do not mind pointing out
>errors as
>I find then, (But would like to know where the best place to send this would
>be?) But in its present state it is not worth hardcopy publishing.

Rather harsh?

Much is valid, some outdated. If docbook were static, it wouldn't be
as valid surely?

I'm sure either of the docbook lists would listen to your error list
(and chances are they would be acted on).

I 'read' the print, use the on-line for quick search/reference.

REgards DaveP