[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: DOCBOOK: Re: funcdef/function/returnvalue
/ Trevor Jenkins <trevor.jenkins@suneidesis.com> was heard to say: | In TDG the examples for funcdef are of this style: | | <funcdef>int <function>sample</function></funcdef> | | However, the content model for function allows the returnvalue element. | This implies that one could markup that same function as: | | <funcdef><function><returnvalue>int</returnvalue> sample</function></funcdef> | | Now the question is whether that's sensible. (I'd argue that returntype is | a better name for an element in this context.) | | How would others markup such function definitions? Staying with TDG or | going with the alternative. Returnvalue is a relatively new addition. I think it makes sense to markup the return type. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | The First Amendment is often http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | inconvenient. But that is besides Chair, DocBook Technical Committee | the point. Inconvenience does not | absolve the government of its | obligation to tolerate | speech.--Justice Anthony Kennedy, | in 91-155
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC