[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: DOCBOOK: Re: A proposal to clarify the semantics of DocBookgraphics
On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 10:47:54AM +0100, Yann Dirson wrote: > On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 03:47:41PM -0500, Norman Walsh wrote: > > / Rory Hunter <roryh@fenriz.org> was heard to say: > > | Something like, mediawidth vs. reproductionwidth (but not to pretentious)? > > > > I take your point. Unfortunately, removing the existing attributes > > would require waiting until DocBook V6.0. And the semantics of the > > existing attributes are reproductionwidth and reproductiondepth. > > Maybe I'm just confused, but I'd rather distinguish: > > physicalwidth (or mediawidth) > the actual width of the image > > viewportwidth > the width of the area in which the image is to be reproduced > > reproductionwidth > the effective width of the image > > > If I understand well, in the current proposal "width" stands for my > "reproductionwidth", "contentwidth" stands for my "physicalwidth", and > we have nothing for my "physicalwidth". Right ? In order to prevent further confusion, can you restate that last paragraph? You used "physicalwidth" twice. 8^) Bob Stayton 400 Encinal Street Publications Architect Santa Cruz, CA 95060 Technical Publications voice: (831) 427-7796 Caldera International, Inc. fax: (831) 429-1887 email: bobs@caldera.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC