[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: DOCBOOK: RFE #473365: Allow optional in funcprototype
Norman Walsh wrote: > The TC discussed this and is considering adding an 'optionalparamdef' > wrapper instead (i.e., instead of optional above, not instead of paramdef). > > Does this seem useful to the community at large? > > Is a similar optionalmethodparam element needed for methodparam? python has some unusual parameter passing rules, too, for example you can pass a parameter by name such as 'foo(bar=42)'. Wouldn't it make sense to annotate the 'paramdef' entity with an attribute that assigns such a type ? That could be any string such as 'optional', 'named' or whatever fits for a given language... Regards, Stefan
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC