[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: DOCBOOK: Re: packagename proposal/RFE
At 10:24 AM +0000 6/5/02, Matt G. wrote: >>1. Is "packagename" the right name for symmetry with classname and >>interfacename or should this be simply "package"? Or perhapps >>"oopackage" for symmetry with ooclass and oointerface? > >Personally, I fail to see why 'package' wouldn't work just as well. >Unless 'package' is desired as a structural element, there would be >no meaningful distinction between using 'package' and 'packagename', >for an inline element. > > To me, a "package" is something that contains classes, whereas the proposed "packagename" element would only contain PCDATA. But this is a minor issue, so either way works for me. -- +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@metalab.unc.edu | Writer/Programmer | +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | The XML Bible, 2nd Edition (Hungry Minds, 2001) | | http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/bible2/ | | http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0764547607/cafeaulaitA/ | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+ | Read Cafe au Lait for Java News: http://www.cafeaulait.org/ | | Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.cafeconleche.org/ | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC