[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: DOCBOOK: Re: Issues with processing expectations of the proposedannotation element
/ Yann Dirson <ydirson@fr.alcove.com> was heard to say: | How do people feel <annotation> would relate to <footnote> and <remark> ? You might sell me on deprecating remark in favor of a class of annotation, but I think footnote should stay. It already exists, it has well understood semantics, and it has a related footnoteref element. Remark, on the other hand, is really a sort of kind of annotation and someone recently asked why it can't contain paras and such. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Necessity may be the mother of http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | invention, but Yankees invent Chair, DocBook Technical Committee | because it's cold outside and | we're cheap.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC