[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: DOCBOOK: Issues with processing expectations of the proposedannotation element
At 10:49 27/06/2002 +0200, Yann Dirson wrote: >How do people feel <annotation> would relate to <footnote> and <remark> ? Markup wise, same thing different name? >It seems to me that <remark> would be just a special case of ><annotation> (class="(Editorial|ProofReader)", and maybe a couple >more), and that <footnote> could be merged into <annotation> as well, >but I'd rather not use "footnote" as a class value, as it has IMHO too >much layout-oriented connotation. Maybe footnotes could be made the >default processing for <annotation>, and some annotation classes >(eg. editorial comments) would be possible to render as marginalia. Principle being that annotations (== notes?) default to being placed at the end (of something) unless another location is specified... where? in the source or in the stylesheet :-) regards DaveP
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC