[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: DOCBOOK: docbook vs latex
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Doug du Boulay wrote: > Dear Ramon, Hi Doug, > Wouldnt it be possible to put in an RFE to try and > get mathelement, maththeorem etc into DocBook? Well, I think I did it a couple of years ago (there was no project at sourceforge), and my petition was rejected, based on the fact that DocBook should remain all-purpose.. I don't recall the arguments exactly. Having used LaTeX for a while, I also liked subfigure, grouping figures in terms of "simulation a" "simulation b" and "after/before", so I also requested a <subfigure> element ... Finally, I thought that these were *my* needs which may not suit everyone. > I imagine its the lack of support for/demand by mathematics users that has > allowed DocBook to progress so far without such elements. I would like to see them added to DocBook (in fact, my last DocBook-like doc. has plenty of theorems, equations and so on) but I am not sure if that is the goal of DocBook. > Or are they so incompatible? Although I would like to see <maththeorem><mathproof> etc. added to docbook, I consider thigs like <latex>\begin{equation}</latex> a temporary hack. I do think that mathml is the way to go, and in this sense there is a "very timid" approach in db2latex to render mathml using LaTeX. > just a thought Thanks Ramon
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC