[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: DOCBOOK: simple ToC question
Looks like they're using DSSSL: <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN"> <HTML><HEAD><TITLE> NPACI Rocks User's Guide </TITLE> <META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="Modular DocBook HTML Stylesheet Version 1.64"> So they'll have to go here for their delicious reading: http://www.dpawson.co.uk/docbook/dsssl/dsssl.html http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/dsssl/current/doc/html/r1081.htm http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/dsssl/current/doc/html/index.html (Or the corresponding place in their distribution for the 1.64 docs) And that's the sum of what I know about DSSSL :-) David > -----Original Message----- > From: Dave Pawson [mailto:dpawson@nildram.co.uk] > Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 12:42 PM > To: Federico Sacerdoti; docbook@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: Re: DOCBOOK: simple ToC question > > > At 18:35 02/10/2002, Federico Sacerdoti wrote: > >Hello, > > > >We here at SDSC love docbook as everyone does. I have a > question about how we can make our HTML ToC look better. > Currently, our Rocks cluster homepage, > http://www.rocksclusters.org/, is very simple, and I feel > hard to visually parse. > > Perspective? > > Its 'visually' well laid out, IMO numbers wouldn't help with that? > If it were chapters or sections which actually numbered... > but > > Installing a Rocks Cluster isn't section/chapter 2, > so (very much my opinion) it's not needed? > > However :-) > > See http://www.dpawson.co.uk/docbook/styling/params.html#d6e18 > > or > > http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/current/doc/fo/chap ter.autolabel.html and lots of stuff more.... http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/current/doc/html/index.html is the html version. Makes delicious reading (perhaps I shouldn't admit that :-) regards DaveP
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC